In response to concerns over the cozy relationships between some boards of directors and executives at public companies, the SEC has reformed its guidelines for shareholder voting (proxy voting) so that significant long-term shareholders can “. . . under certain circumstances, include a nominee or nominees for director in company proxy materials.” Previously, the board controlled the ballot. Under these circumstances, a shareholder movement to add a certain board member or defeat a proposed board member was extremely unlikely to succeed (they were extremely rarely successful). Given all the restrictions on the proposal, it seems minor, but it has created a firestorm of debate because it changes the power balance in the control of corporations. Here is the SEC’s summary of their proposal, and the public comments that argue its merits.
- RT @GrupoGuayacan: Professor @yaelhochberg talks about creating a risk capital industry and the role of different sectors in the ecosystem.… 1 day ago
- RT @themadstone: The only winner tonight is the Voyager probe, which is speeding away from the Earth at 17 kilometers/second #debatenight 4 days ago
- AIG amusing diversions bailout bank regulation Bernanke CDS derivatives Dodd-Frank Act Euro Debt Crisis FDIC Fed Finance & the Public Interest financial crisis Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission financial reform Goldman Sachs GSEs Lehman Brothers MBS mortgages pensions public finance recession regulation SEC securitization TARP too big to fail Treasury Uncategorized