Here is the first annual report of the Office of Financial Research. Among other things, the report details what the OFR don’t know and would like to. Interesting reading for those interested in questions like what should be monitored? Why? Are there clever ways to measure it? And if not, how could one structure surveys or regulation to measure it?
Archive for the ‘Finance & the Public Interest’ Category
The OFR’s first annual report
Posted in Dodd-Frank Act, Finance & the Public Interest, Office of Financial Stability, Treasury, Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on July 24, 2012| Leave a Comment »
The Dealers vs. Financial Reform
Posted in CDS, derivatives, Finance & the Public Interest, financial reform on April 9, 2010| Leave a Comment »
Robert Litan has written a forceful, balanced, and brave discussion of financial reform. Here is an excerpt:
I have written this essay primarily to call attention to the main impediments to meaningful reform: the private actors who now control the trading of derivatives and all key elements of the infrastructure of derivatives trading, the major dealer banks. The importance of this “Derivatives Dealers’ Club” cannot be overstated. All end-users who want derivatives products, CDS in particular, must transact with dealer banks …
I will argue that the major dealer banks have strong financial incentives and the ability to delay or impede changes from the status quo — even if the legislative reforms that are now being widely discussed are adopted — that would make the CDS and eventually other derivatives markets safer and more transparent for all concerned.
If you care about the prospects for meaningful financial reform, you should read Litan’s essay.
Lehman’s Window Dressing
Posted in Finance & the Public Interest, financial crisis, Lehman on March 12, 2010| Leave a Comment »
The story today about Lehman’s accounting manipulations can only be described as shocking. The details are to be found in the “Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Chapter 11 Proceedings Examiner’s Report”. I am not an accountant, and based on a quick look at FAS 140 I do not understand why Lehman thought it could do what it did. But it seems to me that this case is a poster child for a change in accounting rules.
They Just Can’t Help Themselves
Posted in Finance & the Public Interest, Goldman Sachs, Greece, swaps on March 4, 2010| 2 Comments »
An impish grin spreads across [Goldman CEO Lloyd] Blankfein’s face. Call him a fat cat who mocks the public. Call him wicked. Call him what you will. He is, he says, just a banker “doing God’s work” — The Sunday Times, November 8, 2009
Goldman Sachs is in the headlines again, this time for a transaction that helped the Greek government report artificially low debt. When you ponder this case, it is hard not to think about Enron.
Where do we go from here?
Posted in bailout, Finance & the Public Interest, financial crisis, GSEs, public finance, tagged bailout, Fannie, FDIC, financial crisis, public finance on October 2, 2009| 1 Comment »
Last week I had the opportunity to opine on this question at a lively conference on the financial crisis sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the World Bank. Since I spoke about things I’ve been meaning to blog about for some time, I decided to post the transcript here. Apologies that the tone is more Fed-esque than the usual posting, but here goes…
Where do we go from here?
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.” Rahm Emanuel, Feb. 2009
I would like to touch briefly on two issues in answer to the question posed for this session: first, the integration of housing finance into the financial and regulatory mainstream; and second, the need to modernize budgetary and regulatory accounting. I chose these topics for several reasons: they are important; they get less attention than is deserved; and I have thought quite a bit about them from both an academic and policy perspective. (more…)
Smoke and Mirrors at the FDIC
Posted in bailout, FDIC, Finance & the Public Interest, financial crisis, tagged bailout, FDIC, financial crisis, Treasury on September 30, 2009| 4 Comments »
” ‘Sheila Bair would take bamboo shoots under her nails before going to Tim Geithner and the Treasury for help,’ said Camden R. Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers.” — New York Times, Sept 22, 2009
We learn today from the New York Times that the FDIC — the independent government agency that insures your bank accounts — is effectively insolvent. It is going to ask insured banks to prepay three years worth of deposit insurance premiums in order to raise $45 billion to replenish the FDIC insurance fund. (more…)
Break the Buck!
Posted in Finance & the Public Interest, money market, SEC, tagged 2a-7, crisis, money market funds, SEC on September 21, 2009| 2 Comments »
Here’s a wonderful idea for a financial product: raise trillions of dollars from investors, invest in a variety of risky assets, and then lie to investors about what the shares of the fund are worth. Just to make this easy, claim that each share is worth $1, even if it’s really worth less. To support this fiction, redeem shares at $1. If prices fall and investors suspect that the shares are actually worth less than $1, they will race to withdraw their funds. The first to withdraw receive $1, the last receive whatever is left, perhaps nothing.
You can be forgiven for thinking that I’ve just described Bernie Madoff’s investment fund. In fact, I’ve described the operation of money market mutual funds in the U.S. (Note that these are mutual funds, not insured “money market accounts” offered by banks.) (more…)
The Empire Strikes Back
Posted in derivatives, Finance & the Public Interest, financial crisis, tagged derivatives, financial crisis on June 4, 2009| 1 Comment »
As nightmarish memories of September 2008 fade, the financial industry is gearing up to fight new regulations. The battle lines are being drawn and became more visible this week. (more…)
There’s Just No Accounting For Federal Bailouts
Posted in bailout, Finance & the Public Interest, financial crisis, tagged bailout, financial crisis on October 27, 2008| 3 Comments »
In the last few months, the federal government has intervened in financial markets to an extent unparalleled in U.S. history. A partial tally includes the $29 billion, no-recourse loan from the Fed to rescue Bear Stearns; the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and their exposure to the credit risk on $5 trillion of residential mortgages; loans in excess of $100 billion to insurance giant AIG, and of course, open-ended Congressional authority for U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to purchase up to $700 billion in troubled assets from financial institutions, part of which has already financed the purchase of over $250 billion of preferred bank stock.
Whatever you think about the wisdom of these interventions, one fact is indisputable: The government is not saying how much it expects all of this to cost us. The dearth of official estimates has, on one hand, led to Pollyannaish claims like “taxpayers could actually make money on this.”. On the other hand, it has stoked fears that taxpayers may be on the hook for trillions of dollars in losses. (more…)
The End of the Beginning
Posted in AIG, Finance & the Public Interest, financial crisis, tagged financial crisis on October 9, 2008| 4 Comments »
“Now, this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”—Winston Churchill, November 10, 1942
When Churchill made his famous statement following the allied victory at El Alamein in North Africa, he was warning the public not to be too optimistic, and to expect the war to continue for a long time. It now seems clear that the financial crisis will last a long time. I want to suggest here that we are at the “end of the beginning” of the financial crisis, about to enter a new phase. Unfortunately, this is not an optimistic statement, merely an assessment. The government is fast running out of policy options that bear any resemblance to “free market” policies. What remains is for the federal government to run everything. And this is what is gradually occurring. The challenge will then be for the government to undo all of its intervention as quickly as possible. (more…)