The SEC’s suit against Goldman has clobbered the bank’s stock, and energized the public so as to shift the balance of power away from the banks towards the government. It is now much harder to oppose significant regulation because of the populist impact of the documentation of Goldman salesmen making like con men. This has raised a question from the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Republicans. They ask of the SEC: was there “any sort of pre-arrangement, coordination, direction or advance notice” from the SEC to the Administration or Congressional Democrats. Justice should not be about PR, and while the Republicans are not contending that the enforcement of laws has been compromised, I guess the timing looks fishy. But fishy timing is a minor issue. This is a reminder that regulators are not independent of those who want more regulation or those who want less – they have bosses who will seek to use or badger them for their own political goals. Just maybe, this was the goal of the question in the first place.
Politics, Law Enforcement, and Independence
April 22, 2010 by Jonathan Parker
Posted in Goldman Sachs, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, SEC | Leave a Comment
-
Recent Posts
Twitter: Yael Hochberg
- I don’t get why people who are not wearing masks on the plane still insist on wiping down every inch of surface wit… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- @AmericanAir Help! I am on flight 2737 to Dallas connecting to flight 48 to CDG and the first flight out of IAH is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
Archives
Recent Comments
- AIG amusing diversions bailout bank regulation Bernanke CDS derivatives Dodd-Frank Act Euro Debt Crisis FDIC Fed Finance & the Public Interest financial crisis Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission financial reform Goldman Sachs GSEs Lehman Brothers MBS mortgages pensions public finance recession regulation SEC securitization TARP too big to fail Treasury Uncategorized
Leave a Reply